Most Viewed Stories
- COLUMN: The beach: From hog heaven to greedy pigs
- COLUMN: Huff and puff: A beach restoration fairy tale
- City to review 15-story condo project that would change Destin's skyline (with RENDERING)
- COTTAGES FOR A CAUSE: Playhouses are serious stuff for children’s charity
- At WaterColor GOP retreat, Sansom paints gloomy picture
Most Commented Stories
Save & Share this Article
Okaloosa Commission cuts east Destin beaches out of the equation
DESTIN — Last week’s Florida Supreme Court ruling on the legality of the Walton County beach restoration project has led Okaloosa County commissioners to cut back on the upcoming work in Destin.
Commissioners approved two emergency amendments Tuesday to reduce the length of the Destin-Okaloosa Island restoration project by 1.5 miles and to amend the scope of the Municipal Services Benefit Unit that will partially fund the work.
The changes removed about 2,500 properties from the MSBU and could cut about $6 million from the estimated $26 million price tag, said Jim Trifilio, beach projects manager for the county’s Tourist Development Council.
“The Supreme Court has ruled that you have the authority to renourish beaches if they are critically eroded,” County Attorney John Dowd told commissioners.
The Destin-Okaloosa Island restoration project was planned to stretch from Henderson Beach State Recreation Area to the west jetty in Destin and from the western portion of Beasley Park to the El Matador condominiums on the island.
While the Florida Department of Environmental Protection has deemed the beach on Okaloosa Island and the western portion of the Destin segment to be critically eroded, the eastern portion of the beach in Destin has not been deemed critically eroded.
Destin beaches from the west jetty to roughly the western boundary of Sand Print Drive still will be restored. The work from Sand Print Drive east to Henderson Beach State Recreation Area has been canceled and the MSBU revoked for the properties in that area.
Dowd said the emergency amendments were needed to give Okaloosa County Property Appraiser Pete Smith time to certify the tax rolls without the MSBU fees for residents who are no longer in the MSBU. State law requires that tax rolls be certified by Oct. 17 and the next commission meeting is not until Oct. 21.
TDC Executive Director Darrel Jones said the reduction of the project will not lead to higher cost among property owners still in the MSBU. He hopes the project will start next year as planned.
Okaloosa Island condo owner and avid beach restoration critic David Sherry offered this response to the commission's decision.
"Today, the Okaloosa county commissioners voted to remove the Destin beachfront not designated as critically eroded from the MSBU and the beach restoration project.
The area removed today is roughly 2/3 of the Destin project area. Here is how that impacts the funding formula:
Old Math
Project cost = $25.9 million
State grants = $ 8.0 million
TDC Bed Tax = $10.8 million
Shortfall requiring MSBU = $7.1 million
New Math
Project cost = $16.9 million
State grants = $ 8.0 million
TDC Bed Tax = $10.8 million
Shortfall requiring MSBU = minus $1.9 million
The area removed from the project does not impact either the state or TDC monies collected, but it removes over 2 miles of beach from the project. Costs go down more than revenue. The resulting savings means there is no need for an MSBU."
See archived 'News' Stories »
| Why is it so difficult to get public information from public officials in Okaloosa county? 15 days of silence is too long. |
|
| do right - Oct 14, 2008 09:19:25 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Its Monday morning, 14 days since the Supreme court ruling. Where are the revised project figures from Okaloosa county? Why do we pay Mr Trifilio 120 thousand dollars a year salary as beach projects manager when he cant give us figures after two weeks? |
|
| beach lover - Oct 13, 2008 10:06:23 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| They shouldnt call this the "beach restoration" MSBU, they should call it the "give the TDC a bigger slush fund" MSBU. |
|
| the borg - Oct 13, 2008 08:41:56 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| I could not agree more with just the beginning! Something is wrong with the whole picture and has been for some time. |
|
| John - Oct 12, 2008 11:43:28 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Bravo to just the beginning. There is no need for this MSBU tax. Commissioners do the right thing. |
|
| do right - Oct 12, 2008 09:16:21 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Destin, clean house. If you need to bring in the federal government to investigate you local government do it. Take a good hard look at your commissioners and council members. Follow the money, follow the spending, follow the perks. Enough is Enough. |
|
| just the beginning - Oct 09, 2008 10:12:53 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| The MSBU treats special people different than ordinary people. Destin Pointe is special, only 50 dollars an owner per year MSBU. Okaloosa island citizens are ordinary, they pay as much as 481 dollars an owner per year. Destin Pointe needs sand, Okaloosa island does not. |
|
| ordinary citizen - Oct 09, 2008 08:48:08 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| The MSBU is assessed on the public beach in front of Okaloosa island properties. The MSBU is not assessed on the public beach in front of Destin Pointe. Go figure. |
|
| Okaloosa math - Oct 09, 2008 08:42:10 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| You can call the MSBU by any name you want, an assessment, a tax, whatever but call it Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. The Co. Commissioners, the City Council Members and the Tourist Board People that put this together and then approved it should be ousted and ousted fast. They are not doing a good job for Destin and the local people. Money, Developers and Tourists are their only concern. The so called locals have to move because they can no longer afford to live in Destin. You all have ruined this town and now its a seven dollar an hour economy for the real locals. |
|
| just the beginning - Oct 09, 2008 05:41:20 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Not a tax? Dont be ridiculous. Previous post must be from a liberal happy to see any tax as long as he does not actually pay it himself. Lets examine this MSBU and see for ourselves. The MSBU is imposed by the government. It is forceably collected from people who do not want to pay it but have no choice. It is enforced by the full power of the state and the state will confiscate your home if you do not pay it. Sure sounds like a tax to me. If it walks like a duck. |
|
| Duck Test - Oct 09, 2008 12:11:12 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Sarah Palin would take it off the tax bills.
Joe Biden would keep it and line his pockets with it!
We'll see what kind of commissioners we have in Okaloosa Island-and everybody is paying attention! |
|
| truthhurts - Oct 09, 2008 11:40:08 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| See your confusion is that an MSBU assessment is a tax. If you consult the jurisprudence that interprets the MSBU provisions of the state constitution and statutes, it clearly says an MSBU assessment is not a tax. Taxes have stricter guidelines. |
|
| Legalbeagle - Oct 09, 2008 11:05:33 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Where but Okaloosa county do officials enact a special tax for a project, and then keep charging the tax when it is proven not needed for the project? Is that legal? Years from now when the lawsuits are settled we will find out. |
|
| overtaxed - Oct 09, 2008 08:54:25 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Many citizens participated in the public hearings. Sometimes there were standing room only protests of this project. Most all wanted the beach left alone. Why cant Jetty East and Destin Pointe get their sand for their private beach and leave the rest of us alone? |
|
| sand lover - Oct 09, 2008 08:44:58 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| The best ruling yet, I've always said, do nothing, leave the beach alone, plant the dunes with poison ivy to keep man off and let mother nature reclaim her own beach. It doesn't effect the public waterline only the amount of sand between water and condo. |
|
| bb - Oct 09, 2008 08:23:46 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| I had asked this very question to city authorities very early on - why can't we just do the Destin Pointe and JE area and leave the rest alone as those residents are happy with what they have? I was told that there would not be enough money to fund those areas without restoring the rest of the beaches. I believed him. I guess that was a mistake. I think this makes very good sense unless I am being led down a wrong path again. |
|
| jack - Oct 08, 2008 11:04:04 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| There is no Benefit in this Municipal Services Benefit Unit. Citizens have fought the project from inception. Kill the MSBU and restore only Jetty East and Destin Pointe. |
|
| no benefit - Oct 08, 2008 10:43:54 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| It really should not take a lawsuit to get elected officials to treat taxpayers fairly. Our property taxes are already so high that sometimes I feel like we are all servants. The commissioners should do the right thing and not put an extra tax on people for something they neither need nor want! |
|
| John - Oct 08, 2008 09:43:33 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Jack, there will be no extra advalorem MSBU tax bill now if the commissioners will eliminate the MSBU. There are 10 days left for the commissioners to act. There is more than enough money in the project from state funding plus some TDC bed tax. We can have a win-win-win-win-win. Lower TDC funding, no MSBU, less lawsuits, faster DEP permit, and better sand quality for that small area of Destin Pointe and Jetty East that needs help. |
|
| 5 wins - Oct 08, 2008 09:05:15 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Hey, this will work. Let's do it. Hopefully, it will improve the quality of sand and decrease the total cost as well and the per person cost as well to those taxed. Sounds like a win/win situation. |
|
| jack - Oct 08, 2008 08:55:36 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |








