Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Welcome
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

LETTER: Amendment Six will help preserve our fishing fleet



November 4th, Florida voters will have the opportunity to vote on six proposed Constitutional Amendments.  Passage of Amendment Six is essential to the preservation of public access to Florida's waterways and the revitalization of the state's marine industry.
 The ballot title of this proposed amendment is Assessment of Working Waterfront Property Based upon Current Use. I urge all voters concerned with public access to the waters of the state to vote to enact Amendment Six.
Currently, working waterfront businesses (public marinas and dry storage facilities, public launch ramps, commercial fishing facilities, water-dependent marine manufacturing facilities, and vessel construction and repair facilities) are assessed at “highest and best use,” as luxury condos or waterfront resorts, rather than recognizing the current use of the property.
In other words, the properties are taxed based on potential use of the property, rather than on actual use. Consequently, public access to Florida's waterfronts is being taxed out of existence as marine-related businesses, both commercial and recreational, are unable to afford these artificially high property taxes.  Such unrealistic taxes are especially harmful to Destin’s Charter Fishing Fleet, already reeling from increasing fuel prices, more restrictive catch limits, and the general downturn in the economy and our tourism industry.
Each year, Florida's marine industry contributes more than $18 billion to Florida's economy and provides 220,000 in state jobs.
Unlike other businesses, the marine industry cannot relocate to a site without direct access to the water. Our existing working waterfronts are a critical link connecting both residents and tourists to Florida's abundant fish, wildlife, natural resources, and recreational opportunities by providing public access to the state's navigable waters.
Passage of Amendment Six, which will require 60 percent of the vote, will provide an effective solution to this issue by assessing realistic taxes on landowners who wish to maintain their working waterfront properties and continue to provide Floridians, tourists and future generations with public access to the state's waterways. 
I urge all Floridians to vote for Amendment Six.
Ed Dunbar
Development Project Manager
Legendary, Inc.


See archived 'Opinion' Stories »
 

Click to vote
Recommend this story?
Yes
No
The online vote: 0 3


Reader's comments




Amendment 6 will NOT give tax break to developers. This amendment if enacted will only prohibit the assessment of property other than its current use. If a working waterfront builds a mondo condo, hotel or any mixed use facility then they will be taxed at this use. This amendment only protects the facilities who are open to the public and do not need to be assessed at the same rate as a mondo condo. "Highest and Best" use should not be used to assess property values. Vote YES on Amendment 6.

Brett Hinely - Oct 29, 2008 06:15:53 PM Remove Comment

 
the main reason to vote yes is it directly helps keep the fishing fleet intact. It may also help developers and who knows else but thats the pork thats goes with bill.

bb - Oct 14, 2008 09:45:18 AM Remove Comment

 
Why should the working man subsidize the Bos family and Legendary? Vote no.

working man - Oct 12, 2008 05:46:09 PM Remove Comment

 
The bossman is a huge suporter of the working waterfront and should get a break, when you do a tenth of work for the harbor you would deserve a break also. I vote yes, thank you

bb - Oct 10, 2008 11:38:46 PM Remove Comment

 
Read the entire ordinance and between the lines. Amendment 6 grants large tax breaks to Emerald Grande and other waterfront properties. It does nothing for marinas. That is just a smoke screen. Vote no.

smoke screen - Oct 10, 2008 09:44:41 PM Remove Comment

 
Yes Yes, Destin is a working waterfront, keep the tradition going, benefits far outweigh the negatives. yes developers will also take advantage of it but in turn helps us all get more access to the water.

bb - Oct 10, 2008 10:57:25 AM Remove Comment

 
Amendment 6 will give us more Emerald Grandes. Stop the lunacy and vote no.

just say no - Oct 10, 2008 09:01:33 AM Remove Comment

 
Consider the source. Bigger development if you vote for amendment 6.

vote no - Oct 09, 2008 11:40:26 AM Remove Comment

 
The other side of the story, passage of this amendment is a huge break for developers like Legendary. Okaloosa commissioners passed working waterfronts with an addition to slash the ad valorem taxes for the new Hilton hotel. Less taxes for them, more taxes for the working man. Vote no.

perspective - Oct 07, 2008 07:55:01 PM Remove Comment
 

Add your comments
Please follow and enforce these guidelines:
1. No flaming. Do not be hostile.
2. No comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd, sexually-oriented, threatening, libelous, or illegal.
3. No racial slurs or insults.
4. "Remove Comment" flags offensive comment for removal.

Verification Code:
Enter Verification:
Your Name:
Your Comment:
By submitting this form, you agree to this site's terms of service




Jobs
Autos
Real Estate
Classifieds
Today's Ads
Search for Jobs - Monster.com
   
Weather
Yellow Pages
NWS Destin - Fair
67°F
Fair and 67°F
Winds From the Southwest at 7 MPH
Last Update: November 20, 2008 - 1:20PM
ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
THIS WEEK'S POLL
In light of the recent Supreme Court decision on beach restoration, should the county scrap its plans to tax beachfront owners in a special assessment?
Yes
No
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site