Democratic lawmakers in Florida entered this year’s legislative session hoping to flex a little more muscle on guns.
By one count just before the session opened, Democrats had offered more than 50 bills affecting gun ownership, possession, or sales.
But in recent weeks some Florida cases have shown that, despite the good intentions that supposedly accompany such legislation, denying the right of self-defense via guns is ill-advised.
In November, Polk County Circuit Judge Jalal Harb dismissed a manslaughter charge against Deryke Jamal Dennard of Lake Alfred. Dennard shot and killed Jonathan Lee Jordan of Haines City in 2016 after Jordan reportedly punched him the face a couple of times and threatened him in a confrontation at a ballfield. Judge Harb noted in his ruling that some of the threats issued by Jordan and some associates referenced shooting Dennard. Harb determined that Dennard, who did not have a criminal history, was legitimately fearful of being harmed, if not killed.
This week Haines City police Chief Jim Elensky announced that Devonte Duga would not be charged with murder in the slaying of Furious Bernard Shell on Sunday outside a supermarket. According to police, Shell allegedly stole a customer’s wallet and wound up in an argument with Duga about the incident after being confronted by both the customer and an employee. While arguing with Duga outside the store, Shell flashed a pistol and threatened to kill Duga. When Duga tried to go back in the store, Shell blocked him, pushed him and then hit him in the head twice with the gun. During an ensuing struggle for the gun, Duga wrested the pistol from Shell and shot him.
It is quite possible that prosecutors in Bartow still may bring homicide charges against Duga based on additional or new evidence.
Yet the issue here is that policymakers who do not like guns and want to somehow wish them out of existence often fail to look at situations from the perspective of people in life-or-death situations.
Obviously all of us want to live in a violence-free society. And no one desires outcomes such as we saw in the examples above. But that’s not always the world we inhabit.
Ironically, it can be argued that Florida and America in general have grown safer in recent decades because we have loosened restrictions on gun ownership and possession. And we should understand that those most adversely affected by tighter gun restrictions are law-abiding residents in poor or predominantly minority neighborhoods.
We don’t fault the intentions of the lawmakers who have proposed and advocate for those 50-plus gun bills in Tallahassee. But we encourage them to consider, for just a moment, what it might be like to have been Devonte Duga, and so many others like him, and not been able to access a gun when your life was on the line.
This editorial first appeared in The Log's sister paper, The Lakeland Ledger.